Internet Email to Support Diverse Service Environments (Lemonade) Profile
RFC 4550
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
I won't make these Gen-ART review comments from Spencer Dawkins a DISCUSS, but they both deserve a moment's thought. In Section 3, "Lemonade clients SHOULD take advantage of these features." doesn't look like a normative/2119 "SHOULD". BC: agreed, I would change it to lower case. In section 3.3, I suppose the SHOULD NOT in A LEMONADE compliant client SHOULD use message size declaration. In particular it SHOULD NOT send a message to a mail submission server, if the client knows that the message exceeds the maximal message size advertised by the submission server. is OK, but <snip> BC: well, I don't see why it would ever be OK to send a message that's too long. Maybe this should just be MUST NOT.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Please change "mandatory to implement" to "mandatory-to-implement" throughout the document. Please change "TLS protected" to "TLS-protected" throughout the document.
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
There shouldn't be any citations in the Abstract.