Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Hello: A Clarification Statement
RFC 4558
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) Yes
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
From Gen-ART review by Spencer Dawkins, in case the document is updated for any other reason: There was one point that I wish was explained better - there are five different places in the draft where a statement like "use of Node-ID based Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling adjacency failure" is made , but "optimal" is never explained or put in context. I can guess what I think it means, but I'm guessing, and a sentence or two of explanation might make the document clearer for many readers.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
Abstract still refers to this document as a BCP, though it seems it is now going for PS. > Use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello messages is implied in a number of > cases, e.g., when data and control plan are separated, when TE links > are unnumbered. Furthermore, when link level failure detection is s/data and control plan/the data and control plane RSVP is expanded in the Abstract after it is used.
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
This really seems more like a proposed standard than a BCP. It seems like there is implementable and testable behavior and that this specification could advance along the standards track. I'd like the authors and possibly WG to consider this. However I do not think it appropriate to hold a discuss on this issue for this document.
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection