Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Hello: A Clarification Statement
RFC 4558
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
03 | (System) | Notify list changed from kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk, dbrungard@att.com to kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk |
|
2012-08-22
|
03 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Brian Carpenter |
|
2006-06-30
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-06-30
|
03 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 4558' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-06-15
|
03 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2006-05-06
|
03 | Ross Callon | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from RFC Published by Ross Callon |
|
2006-05-06
|
03 | Ross Callon | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Ross Callon |
|
2006-05-06
|
03 | Ross Callon | State Change Notice email list have been change to kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk, dbrungard@att.com from kireeti@juniper.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk |
|
2006-03-13
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-03-07
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-03.txt |
|
2006-03-07
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2006-03-07
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2006-03-07
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2006-03-07
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-03-07
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Carpenter has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Brian Carpenter |
|
2006-03-02
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from In Last Call by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-03-02
|
03 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
|
2006-03-01
|
03 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
|
2006-03-01
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot discuss] Sorry to switch my ballot but I just noticed this phrase in the Abstract. "this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello … [Ballot discuss] Sorry to switch my ballot but I just noticed this phrase in the Abstract. "this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello session as a best current practice (BCP) in some scenarios." Since this a proposed standard, the reference to the acronym BCP seems very misleading. Easy fix via Note to RFC Editor: Please delete the abbreviation "(BCP)" in the abstract |
|
2006-03-01
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot discuss] Sorry to switch my ballot but I just noticed this phrase in the Abstract. "this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello … [Ballot discuss] Sorry to switch my ballot but I just noticed this phrase in the Abstract. "this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello session as a best current practice (BCP) in some scenarios." Since this a proposed standard, the reference to the acronym BCP seems very misleading. Easy fix via Note to RFC Editor: Please delete the abbreviation "(BCP") in the abstract |
|
2006-03-01
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot discuss] Sorry to switch my ballot but I just noticed this phrase in the Abstract. "this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello … [Ballot discuss] Sorry to switch my ballot but I just noticed this phrase in the Abstract. "this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello session as a best current practice (BCP) in some scenarios." Since this a proposed standard, the reference to the acronym BCP seems very misleading. Easy fix via Note to RFC Editor: Please delate the abbreviation "(BCP") in the abstract |
|
2006-03-01
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Carpenter has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Brian Carpenter |
|
2006-02-17
|
03 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-02-16 |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot comment] Abstract still refers to this document as a BCP, though it seems it is now going for PS. > Use of Node-ID … [Ballot comment] Abstract still refers to this document as a BCP, though it seems it is now going for PS. > Use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello messages is implied in a number of > cases, e.g., when data and control plan are separated, when TE links > are unnumbered. Furthermore, when link level failure detection is s/data and control plan/the data and control plane RSVP is expanded in the Abstract after it is used. |
|
2006-02-16
|
03 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-02-15
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-15
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation by Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-15
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from BCP |
|
2006-02-15
|
03 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot comment] This really seems more like a proposed standard than a BCP. It seems like there is implementable and testable behavior and that this … [Ballot comment] This really seems more like a proposed standard than a BCP. It seems like there is implementable and testable behavior and that this specification could advance along the standards track. I'd like the authors and possibly WG to consider this. However I do not think it appropriate to hold a discuss on this issue for this document. |
|
2006-02-15
|
03 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
|
2006-02-15
|
03 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
|
2006-02-14
|
03 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
|
2006-02-14
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] From Gen-ART review by Spencer Dawkins, in case the document is updated for any other reason: There was one point that I wish … [Ballot comment] From Gen-ART review by Spencer Dawkins, in case the document is updated for any other reason: There was one point that I wish was explained better - there are five different places in the draft where a statement like "use of Node-ID based Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling adjacency failure" is made , but "optimal" is never explained or put in context. I can guess what I think it means, but I'm guessing, and a sentence or two of explanation might make the document clearer for many readers. |
|
2006-02-14
|
03 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
|
2006-02-13
|
03 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-02-12
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
|
2006-02-07
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-07
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-02-16 by Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-07
|
03 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-07
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Ballot has been issued by Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-07
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2005-11-25
|
03 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
|
2005-11-02
|
03 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Last Call Comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2005-10-27
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2005-10-27
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin |
|
2005-10-27
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Alex Zinin |
|
2005-10-27
|
03 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2005-10-27
|
03 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2005-10-27
|
03 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2005-09-07
|
03 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
|
2005-09-07
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt |
|
2005-09-06
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin |
|
2005-09-06
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Had a question on target status (BCP). Since the spec defines procedures required for interop, it makes sense to put it on the STD track. … Had a question on target status (BCP). Since the spec defines procedures required for interop, it makes sense to put it on the STD track. Waiting for the doc to be re-LC'ed in the WG. |
|
2005-08-29
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alex Zinin |
|
2005-02-19
|
03 | Bill Fenner | Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-01.txt Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:17:55 -0000 From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: <zinin@psg.com> Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "'Kireeti Kompella'" … Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-01.txt Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:17:55 -0000 From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: <zinin@psg.com> Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "'Kireeti Kompella'" <kireeti@juniper.net>, "Bill Fenner" <fenner@research.att.com> Reply-to: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Hi Alex, This draft has been through CCAMP WG last call and has been updated to my satisfaction. Please take it on its next step in the long (some may say too long) journey towards being an RFC. |
|
2005-02-19
|
03 | Bill Fenner | Draft Added by Bill Fenner in state Publication Requested |
|
2004-10-26
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-01.txt |
|
2004-04-26
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-00.txt |