SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows
RFC 4559
Yes
No Objection
(Brian Carpenter)
(David Kessens)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Ted Hardie)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2005-12-13)
Unknown
Shepherding AD evaluation comments are noted in the tracker.
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2005-12-15)
Unknown
Are HTTP Auth extensions something that should be done in an RFC Ed document? No objection to this document, but we've done them in the past with significant review and I thought we might have some policy about such a major HTTP header