Extended RTP Profile for Real-time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback (RTP/AVPF)
RFC 4585
Yes
(Allison Mankin)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Harald Alvestrand)
(Jon Peterson)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Ned Freed)
(Russ Housley)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-02-19)
in draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-feedback-08.txt on page 42, I see: Payload Type: 8 bits Indicates the RTP payload type in the context of which the native RPSI bit string MUST be interpreted. The diagram shows that it is a 7-bit field though! $ /bin/checkpage.awk <drafts/draft-burmeister-avt-rtcp-feedback-sim-05.txt Bad chars at 58 Bad chars at 114 Bad chars at 172 Bad chars at 230 Bad chars at 288 Bad chars at 346 Bad chars at 404 Bad chars at 462 Bad chars at 520 Bad chars at 578 Long line at 586 with 73 chars, only spaces extra Bad chars at 636 Bad chars at 694 Bad chars at 752 Bad chars at 810 Bad chars at 868 Bad chars at 926 Bad chars at 984 Bad chars at 1042 Long line at 1080 with 76 chars, only spaces extra Bad chars at 1100 Bad chars at 1158 Bad chars at 1216 Long line at 1250 with 73 chars, only spaces extra Bad chars at 1274 Bad chars at 1332 Bad chars at 1390 Bad chars at 1448 -: 25 lines containing non-US-ASCII characters -: 3 lines longer than 72 characters, max 76 -: 25 formfeeds not on a line by themselves
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Ned Freed Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-02-17)
I'll let Russ hold the token for the lack of security considerations in draft-burmeister-avt-rtcp-feedback-sim
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-02-17)
Section 6.4 of draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-feedback-08.txt has references to ITU-T and ISO standards for examples of where application layer feedback messages can be drawn. Are there any IETF examples which can be given? Both of the others require a subscription or payment for the standard (though the ITU allows a small number free, it is still essentially a paid service). If not, no big deal, but if there is one of our own standards which can be cited in addition, it seems like a good idea.
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()