Skip to main content

Source-Specific Protocol Independent Multicast in 232/8
RFC 4608

Yes

(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)

No Objection

(Allison Mankin)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Ned Freed)
(Russ Housley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(David Kessens; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-07-06)
Draft: draft-ietf-mboned-ssm232-08
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Date: 5 July 2004

I believe this is ready for BCP, and is necessary for operational reasons.
I didn't see any issues with the text.

I think the requested variance is justified. This is a case where pragmatism
should win. (One could argue that MSDP is a de facto standard and would
be more logically classified as Informational, but that is another thread...)

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2004-01-22)
It might be nice to expand MSDP the first time it is used (at the end of Section 1).

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2004-01-22)
>    SHOULD support source-only trees only, precluding the requirement of

do we need 2119 words   in the first paragraph of the introduction?