Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Frame Relay over Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Networks
RFC 4619
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
>7.7. MPLS Shim EXP Bit Values > > If it is desired to carry Quality of Service information, the Quality > of Service information SHOULD be represented in the EXP field of the > PW MPLS label. If more than one MPLS label is imposed by the ingress > LSR, the EXP field of any labels higher in the stack SHOULD also > carry the same value. Reference missing here?
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
Very nice applicability statement and congestion control considerations - careful presentation about AF vs. EF, uses of diffserv-TE classes, where BECN/FECN can and cannot be handled, and so on.
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
The number of contributing authors listed is remarkable. I would really expect this many names to be handled by a simple list of acknowledgments.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection