Skip to main content

RTP Payload Format for H.263 Moving RFC 2190 to Historic Status
RFC 4628

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2022-01-03
Tina Dang Posted related IPR disclosure Koninklijke KPN N.V.'s Statement about IPR related to RFC 4628 and RFC 8179
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from csp@csperkins.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, roni.even@polycom.co.il to magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, csp@csperkins.org
2007-02-01
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-02-01
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4628' added by Amy Vezza
2007-02-01
06 (System) RFC published
2007-01-17
06 Cullen Jennings [Note]: 'This doc is waiting for  draft-ietf-avt-rfc2429-bis
PROTO shepherd: Colin Perkins csp@csperkins.org' added by Cullen Jennings
2006-11-08
06 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Joseph Salowey.
2006-07-14
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-07-10
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-07-10
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-07-10
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-07-08
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-07-07
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-07-06
2006-07-06
06 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault by Lisa Dusseault
2006-07-06
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2006-07-05
06 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ross Callon by Ross Callon
2006-07-05
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2006-07-05
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2006-07-05
06 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2006-07-05
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko by Jari Arkko
2006-07-05
06 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2006-07-04
06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
Although rfc2429-bis is in RFC Editor queue, things can still happen that could delay or prevent its publication. Yt looks like it …
[Ballot comment]
Although rfc2429-bis is in RFC Editor queue, things can still happen that could delay or prevent its publication. Yt looks like it would be better that such documents include information about the timing when the recommendation comes into effect.

To fix this the following text could be added to Section 3:

  This recommendation will come into effect at the publication or as soon as
  possible after the publication of rfc2429-bis[rfc2429bis].
2006-07-04
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu by Dan Romascanu
2006-07-04
06 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund by Magnus Westerlund
2006-06-30
06 Cullen Jennings I mistakenly put this as historic when it should be informational as it makes something else historic.
2006-06-30
06 Cullen Jennings Intended Status has been changed to Informational from Historic
2006-06-30
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lars Eggert by Lars Eggert
2006-06-29
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2006-06-24
06 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Cullen Jennings
2006-06-24
06 Cullen Jennings Ballot has been issued by Cullen Jennings
2006-06-24
06 Cullen Jennings Created "Approve" ballot
2006-06-24
06 Cullen Jennings Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-07-06 by Cullen Jennings
2006-06-24
06 Cullen Jennings State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cullen Jennings
2006-06-24
06 Cullen Jennings Intended Status has been changed to Historic from Informational
2006-06-23
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-05-29
06 Cullen Jennings
Proto wirte up - 2nd half

Technical Summary

The RTP Payload Format defined in RFC 2190 supports only the 1996 version of H.263. Implementations supporting …
Proto wirte up - 2nd half

Technical Summary

The RTP Payload Format defined in RFC 2190 supports only the 1996 version of H.263. Implementations supporting the 1998 (or later) versions of H.263 must use RFC 2429 or its successor. This draft marks RFC 2190 as historic, to reduce the confusion about which version of the RTP Payload Format to use in new implementations.

Working Group Summary

RFC 2190 was deprecated by the working group in 1998, with the publication of RFC 2429. With the impending publication of 2429bis, there is clear consensus in the working group to formally mark RFC 2190 as historic.

Protocol Quality

The request to mark RFC 2190 as historic has been reviewed by Colin Perkins. There are existing (old) implementations of RFC 2190 - the aim of this draft is to prevent new implementations of it!
2006-05-26
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-05-26
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-05-26
06 Cullen Jennings State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Cullen Jennings
2006-05-26
06 Cullen Jennings Last Call was requested by Cullen Jennings
2006-05-26
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-05-26
06 (System) Last call text was added
2006-05-26
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-05-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-06.txt
2006-05-10
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2006-05-10
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-05.txt
2006-05-08
06 Cullen Jennings State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Cullen Jennings
2006-05-08
06 Cullen Jennings
I looked at the IANA registry stuff and I don't think anything will change on the IANA registries. They will still point at 2190 even …
I looked at the IANA registry stuff and I don't think anything will change on the IANA registries. They will still point at 2190 even though it is historic. Can you update the IANA consideration section to say IANA does not need to do anything. Thanks, Cullen
2006-05-08
06 Cullen Jennings State Change Notice email list have been change to csp@csperkins.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, roni.even@polycom.co.il from csp@csperkins.org, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
2006-04-20
06 Cullen Jennings
PROTO writeup (1st half)

> From: Colin Perkins
> Date: 23 December 2005 20:20:35 GMT
> To: via RT
> Cc: Allison Mankin , Magnus …
PROTO writeup (1st half)

> From: Colin Perkins
> Date: 23 December 2005 20:20:35 GMT
> To: via RT
> Cc: Allison Mankin , Magnus Westerlund 
> , Roni Even
> Subject: Request to publish: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-04.txt
>
> The AVT working group requests  historic-04.txt> be published as an Informational RFC, to move RFC 
> 2190 to Historic Status.
>
>
>    1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the ID and
>        do they believe this ID is sufficiently baked to forward to 
> the
>        IESG for publication?
>
> Yes.
>
>    1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members
>        and key non-WG members?  Do you have any concerns about the
>        depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed?
>
> Yes.
>
>    1.c) Do you have concerns that the document needs more review 
> from a
>        particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational
>        complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)?
>
> I have no concerns.
>
>
>    1.d) Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document 
> that
>        you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of?  For
>        example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts 
> of the
>        document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for
>        it, etc.  If your issues have been discussed in the WG and the
>        WG has indicated it wishes to advance the document anyway, 
> note
>        if you continue to have concerns.
>
> No issues.
>
>    1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document?  Does it
>        represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with
>        others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and
>        agree with it?
>
> There is solid consensus.
>
>    1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme
>        discontent?  If so, please summarise what are they upset 
> about.
>
> No.
>
>    1.g) Have the chairs verified that the document adheres to _all_ of
>        the ID nits? (see http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html).
>
> Yes.
>
>    1.h) Does the document a) split references into normative/
>        informative, and b) are there normative references to IDs, 
> where
>        the IDs are not also ready for advancement or are otherwise in
>        an unclear state? (Note: the RFC editor will not publish an 
> RFC
>        with normative references to IDs, it will delay publication
>        until all such IDs are also ready for publication as RFCs.)
>
> References have been split. There are no normative references to IDs.
>
> Colin
2006-04-05
06 Cullen Jennings Shepherding AD has been changed to Cullen Jennings from Allison Mankin
2006-03-19
06 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: Colin Perkins csp@csperkins.org' added by Allison Mankin
2006-03-19
06 Allison Mankin Separated because this needs revision
2006-01-06
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin
2005-12-23
06 Barbara Fuller State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Barbara Fuller
2005-12-20
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-04.txt
2005-11-09
06 (System) This document has been resurrected.
2005-11-08
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by Allison Mankin
2005-11-07
06 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2005-11-07
06 (System) Document has expired
2005-11-06
06 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD is watching from AD is watching by Allison Mankin
2005-11-06
06 Allison Mankin is this supposed to be Info?  check
2005-11-06
06 Allison Mankin Draft Added by Allison Mankin in state Publication Requested
2005-04-27
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-03.txt
2005-01-31
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-02.txt
2005-01-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-01.txt
2004-09-15
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-00.txt