RADIUS Attributes for Virtual LAN and Priority Support
RFC 4675
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) Yes
In the Abstract: These attributes are usable within either RADIUS or Diameter. while the Diameter Consideration section says: Diameter needs to define identical attributes with the same Type values. The statements seem to be contradictory. Same attributes usable within both protocols, which actually would mean that this document applie for both, or identical attributes with same Type values but yet to be defined within Diameter? I suggest that the text be fixed or incremented to clarify this.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) Yes
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
"RADIUS Server" and "RADIUS Proxy" should be added to the terminology section.
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection