Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Subject Identification Method (SIM)
RFC 4683

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Russ Housley) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-29 for -)
No email
send info
The IANA considerations and registration requirements for SIItypes are quite weak. Better interoperability would be achieved if there was a required registry.

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-29 for -)
No email
send info
Was any thought given to the likelihood that somebody will be
upset by the use of a prominent trademark as an acronym?

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-30 for -)
No email
send info
I don't understand this field very well yet, and in particular I do not understand how SIITypes will be defined.  Will they be defined in a registry, or by separate drafts or other?

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2006-03-27 for -)
No email
send info
Is there any special reason that the appendix uses the ASN.1:1988 Notation rahter than the current ASN.1:2002 notation? For differences and the process of changes between the two see http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/changing-ASN/index.html.

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection