Definition of Events for Modem, Fax, and Text Telephony Signals
RFC 4734

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Lars Eggert) Yes

Comment (2006-05-22 for -)
No email
send info
INTRODUCTION, para. 15:

>    Companion documents add event codes to this registry relating to
>    modem, fax, text telephony, and channel-associated signalling events.
>    The remainder of the event codes defined in RFC 2833 are deprecated.

        What are the companion documents? I'm guessing at least
        draft-ietf-avt-rfc2833bisdata-06, which isn't cited. Are there others?
        Without this information, it's hard to know what the "remainder of the
        event codes defined in RFC 2833" that are being deprecated actually are.

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2006-05-25 for -)
No email
send info
> If the specification is created by an outside body, the IETF-appointed expert must ...

Trying to understand if the rules are clear enough to be followed.
What's "an outside body"? Does it cover only other SDOs, companies,
persons? What about individual submissions through the RFC Editor?
And wouldn't the same checks need to be done even if the document
was an IETF product?

I'd suggest dropping the "if" part and just saying what the
expert needs to do.

Nits (I get these from a script that I run for all documents):

s/occurence/occurrence/
s/occuring/occurring/
two ways to write echo canceller / cancellor
s/renable/re-enable/

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2006-05-22)
No email
send info
  s/IPSEC/IPsec/

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2006-05-23 for -)
No email
send info
1. idnits complains wrt. 2119 boilerplate on both documents. The reason seems to be that the recommended 2119 bolerplate text is not reproduced ad-literam.

2. The abbreviations list in draft-ietf-avt-rfc2833bisdata-06.txt is not complete. PBX and MIME are being used in the document and not included in the list

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund Recuse