vCard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)
RFC 4770

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Lisa Dusseault) Yes

(Sam Hartman) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Brian Carpenter) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2006-09-13)
No email
send info
User question: how do I express that the URI is appropriate for both personal and business communication? If it should be TYPE=BUSINESS,PERSONAL maybe it should be mentioned that types are not exclusive.

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2006-09-12 for -)
No email
send info
  Might want to mention that some vendors have already extended the
  vcard format to include IM addresses. For example, my Apple
  AddressBook vcard has <stuff that I cannot paste here but will send
  by email, because a tracker bug renders the comment empty if I do>.

Section 1., paragraph 4:

>       "sip"[5] indicates to use SIP/SIMPLE,
>       "xmpp"[6] indicates to use XMPP,
>       "irc"[4] indicates to use IRC,
>       "ymsgr" indicates to use yahoo,
>       "msn" might indicate to use Microsoft messenger,
>       "aim" indicates to use AOL, and
>       "im"[8] or "pres"[7] indicates to use a CPIM or CPP gateway.

  Nit: Insert a space before the reference.

Section 2., paragraph 8:

>    o  An indication of the type of communication for which this URI is
>       appropriate.  This can be a value of PERSONAL or BUSINESS.
>    o  An indication of the location of a device associated with this
>       URI.  Values can be HOME, WORK, or MOBILE.

  This set of options only encodes a very limited set of usage
  scenarios.  Is there any rationale that these are sufficient or
  useful? (Since they cannot be omitted according to the ABNF.) Is there
  any definition of the semantics of the tags?

(Bill Fenner) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) Recuse