Skip to main content

Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Transparent Cell Transport Service
RFC 4816

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from pwe3-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2007-02-16
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-02-16
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4816' added by Amy Vezza
2007-02-16
06 (System) RFC published
2006-11-27
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-11-20
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-11-20
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-11-20
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-11-17
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-11-16
2006-11-16
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-11-16
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ted Hardie
2006-11-16
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens
2006-11-16
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
> rigorous then a native ATM service.

s/then/than/
2006-11-16
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2006-11-16
06 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter
2006-11-16
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner
2006-11-15
06 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2006-11-15
06 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2006-11-14
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2006-11-14
06 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2006-11-14
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2006-11-14
06 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2006-11-13
06 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley
2006-11-13
06 Mark Townsley Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley
2006-11-13
06 Mark Townsley Created "Approve" ballot
2006-11-08
06 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Altman
2006-11-08
06 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Altman
2006-11-07
06 Mark Townsley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Mark Townsley
2006-11-07
06 Mark Townsley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-11-16 by Mark Townsley
2006-11-07
06 Mark Townsley Note field has been cleared by Mark Townsley
2006-10-26
06 Yoshiko Fong IANA Last Call Comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2006-10-23
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-10-09
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-10-09
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-10-09
06 Mark Townsley Last Call was requested by Mark Townsley
2006-10-09
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-10-09
06 (System) Last call text was added
2006-10-09
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-10-09
06 Mark Townsley State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Mark Townsley
2006-10-09
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2006-10-09
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt
2006-08-21
06 Mark Townsley [Note]: 'Need to address congestion control, revise Abstract. Send notice to pwe3 chairs on 08/21/2006.' added by Mark Townsley
2006-08-21
06 Mark Townsley State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Mark Townsley
2006-07-06
06 Dinara Suleymanova
PROTO Write-up


1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
    Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID …
PROTO Write-up


1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
    Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ready
    to forward to the IESG for publication?

Yes

1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members
    and key non-WG members?  Do you have any concerns about the
    depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed?

This document has been fully reviewed by the PWE3 WG.

1.c) Do you have concerns that the document needs more review from a
    particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational
    complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)?

We have no concerns.

1.d) Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document that
    you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of?  For
    example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts of the
    document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for
    it.  In any event, if your issues have been discussed in the WG
    and the WG has indicated it that it still wishes to advance the
    document, detail those concerns in the write-up.

We have no concerns.

1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it
    represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with
    others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and
    agree with it?

There is firm consensus for the design described in this document.

1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme
    discontent?  If so, please summarize the areas of conflict in
    separate email to the Responsible Area Director.

No

1.g) Have the chairs verified that the document adheres to all of the
    ID nits? (see http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html).

Yes

1.h) Is the document split into normative and informative references?
    Are there normative references to IDs, where the IDs are not
    also ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state?
    (note here that the RFC editor will not publish an RFC with
    normative references to IDs, it will delay publication until all
    such IDs are also ready for publication as RFCs.)

There are no informative references needed. All of the normative references are either RFCs or are in the RFC editor's queue.


1.i) For Standards Track and BCP documents, the IESG approval
    announcement includes a write-up section with the following
    sections:

    *    Technical Summary

This document describes an extension to draft-ietf-pwe3-atm-encap-10.txt to support transparent cell transport service that makes use of the "N-to-one" cell relay mode for PWE3 ATM cell encapsulation.
i.e. to provide an ATM trunk pseudowire service.

    *    Working Group Summary

This draft has been extensively reviewed by the PWE3 WG and there is consensus for it.

    *    Protocol Quality

There are no known issues with this protocol.
2006-07-06
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2006-04-10
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-05.txt
2005-09-09
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-04.txt
2005-07-14
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-03.txt
2005-02-21
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-02.txt
2004-08-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-01.txt
2004-08-12
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-00.txt