Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Transparent Cell Transport Service
RFC 4816
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
06 | (System) | Notify list changed from pwe3-chairs@ietf.org to (None) |
|
2007-02-16
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2007-02-16
|
06 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 4816' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2007-02-16
|
06 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2006-11-27
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-11-20
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2006-11-20
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2006-11-20
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2006-11-17
|
06 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-11-16 |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ted Hardie |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] > rigorous then a native ATM service. s/then/than/ |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter |
|
2006-11-16
|
06 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner |
|
2006-11-15
|
06 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
|
2006-11-15
|
06 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
|
2006-11-14
|
06 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
|
2006-11-14
|
06 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
|
2006-11-14
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2006-11-14
|
06 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
|
2006-11-13
|
06 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley |
|
2006-11-13
|
06 | Mark Townsley | Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-11-13
|
06 | Mark Townsley | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2006-11-08
|
06 | (System) | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Altman |
|
2006-11-08
|
06 | (System) | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Altman |
|
2006-11-07
|
06 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-11-07
|
06 | Mark Townsley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-11-16 by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-11-07
|
06 | Mark Townsley | Note field has been cleared by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-10-26
|
06 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Last Call Comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2006-10-23
|
06 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | Mark Townsley | Last Call was requested by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
|
2006-10-09
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt |
|
2006-08-21
|
06 | Mark Townsley | [Note]: 'Need to address congestion control, revise Abstract. Send notice to pwe3 chairs on 08/21/2006.' added by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-08-21
|
06 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-07-06
|
06 | Dinara Suleymanova | PROTO Write-up 1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID … PROTO Write-up 1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ready to forward to the IESG for publication? Yes 1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members and key non-WG members? Do you have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? This document has been fully reviewed by the PWE3 WG. 1.c) Do you have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)? We have no concerns. 1.d) Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document that you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if your issues have been discussed in the WG and the WG has indicated it that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns in the write-up. We have no concerns. 1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? There is firm consensus for the design described in this document. 1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarize the areas of conflict in separate email to the Responsible Area Director. No 1.g) Have the chairs verified that the document adheres to all of the ID nits? (see http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html). Yes 1.h) Is the document split into normative and informative references? Are there normative references to IDs, where the IDs are not also ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? (note here that the RFC editor will not publish an RFC with normative references to IDs, it will delay publication until all such IDs are also ready for publication as RFCs.) There are no informative references needed. All of the normative references are either RFCs or are in the RFC editor's queue. 1.i) For Standards Track and BCP documents, the IESG approval announcement includes a write-up section with the following sections: * Technical Summary This document describes an extension to draft-ietf-pwe3-atm-encap-10.txt to support transparent cell transport service that makes use of the "N-to-one" cell relay mode for PWE3 ATM cell encapsulation. i.e. to provide an ATM trunk pseudowire service. * Working Group Summary This draft has been extensively reviewed by the PWE3 WG and there is consensus for it. * Protocol Quality There are no known issues with this protocol. |
|
2006-07-06
|
06 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested |
|
2006-04-10
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-05.txt |
|
2005-09-09
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-04.txt |
|
2005-07-14
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-03.txt |
|
2005-02-21
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-02.txt |
|
2004-08-23
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-01.txt |
|
2004-08-12
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-00.txt |