Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) Circuit Emulation over Packet (CEP)
RFC 4842

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
14 (System) Notify list changed from pwe3-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Magnus Westerlund
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2007-04-23
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-04-23
14 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4842' added by Amy Vezza
2007-04-11
14 (System) RFC published
2007-01-22
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2007-01-22
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-01-21
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-01-17
14 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-01-17
14 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-01-17
14 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-01-17
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2007-01-15
14 Mark Townsley
[Note]: 'Email to authors/chairs about new wording referring to "PW Layer Security" - should be resolvable with RFC Editor''s note, and is last remaining issue ...
2006-12-29
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2006-12-28
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-14.txt
2006-11-08
14 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand
2006-11-08
14 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand
2006-10-31
14 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2006-10-31
14 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
I expected the security considerations to suggest IPsec as a
  possible security solution whin IP is used.  Why is it omitted?
2006-10-31
14 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Magnus Westerlund
2006-10-30
14 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
Please update on how RTP is used for timing only and why this makes any extension for RTP (including SRTP) not allowed. (Like ...
2006-10-12
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-10-12
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from DNP-waiting for AD note by Amy Vezza
2006-10-12
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to DNP-waiting for AD note from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-10-12
14 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2006-10-12
14 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2006-10-12
14 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner
2006-10-12
14 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2006-10-12
14 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
I'm surprised that 5.2.1 doesn't discuss how long to wait at startup before
starting playout. It seems advisable to build up a short ...
2006-10-12
14 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter
2006-10-12
14 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens
2006-10-11
14 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2006-10-11
14 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I don't think a specification should subset RTP in such a way that it eliminates every one of the RTP extensibility mechanism. I ...
2006-10-11
14 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2006-10-11
14 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.3:

This specification redefines RTP header behavior. Just two examples of this:
      P : Padding.  No padding is required.  ...
2006-10-11
14 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.3:

This specification redefines RTP header behavior. Just two examples of this:
      P : Padding.  No padding is required.  ...
2006-10-11
14 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.3:

This specification redefines RTP header behavior. Just two examples of this:
      P : Padding.  No padding is required.  ...
2006-10-11
14 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
The document seems to lack a both a reference to RFC 2119 and the
  recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears ...
2006-10-11
14 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2006-10-11
14 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.3:

This specification redefines RTP header behavior. Just two examples of this:
      P : Padding.  No padding is required.  ...
2006-10-11
14 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2006-10-10
14 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2006-10-09
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2006-10-09
14 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
RTP is an option.  So, why isn't SRTP an option for providing
  security?  Similarly, I expected the security considerations to
  suggest ...
2006-10-09
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2006-10-09
14 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
I'm abstaining because while I think the document is rather
incomplete, I am not sure of any harm done.
Things I would fix: ...
2006-10-09
14 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2006-10-06
14 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
This document follows the requirements and architecture defined in RFC3916 and RFC4197. RFC3916 includes in Section 6 a statement that 'Each PWE3 approach ...
2006-09-26
14 Mark Townsley Telechat date was changed to 2006-10-12 from  by Mark Townsley
2006-09-26
14 Mark Townsley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-10-12 by Mark Townsley
2006-09-26
14 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley
2006-09-26
14 Mark Townsley Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley
2006-09-26
14 Mark Townsley Created "Approve" ballot
2006-09-15
14 Yoshiko Fong IANA Last Call Comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2006-09-04
14 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-08-21
14 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-08-21
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-08-21
14 Mark Townsley Last Call was requested by Mark Townsley
2006-08-21
14 Mark Townsley State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Mark Townsley
2006-08-21
14 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-08-21
14 (System) Last call text was added
2006-08-21
14 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-07-07
14 Dinara Suleymanova
PROTO Write-up

1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ready ...
2006-07-07
14 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2006-06-05
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-13.txt
2006-01-09
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-12.txt
2005-05-18
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-11.txt
2005-02-21
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-10.txt
2004-09-07
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-09.txt
2004-06-22
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-08.txt
2004-06-07
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-07.txt
2004-05-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-06.txt
2004-04-26
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-05.txt
2004-03-31
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-04.txt
2003-10-24
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-03.txt
2003-07-02
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-02.txt
2003-02-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-01.txt
2002-07-25
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-00.txt