IPv6 Enterprise Network Analysis - IP Layer 3 Focus
RFC 4852

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(David Kessens; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -)
No email
send info

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2006-06-05 for -)
No email
send info
The reference [V6DEF] is not filled in (referenced in section 5), nor is [DNSV6REC], [NIS], [DHCPv4], [ADDRCONF], [IPSEC] or [PRIVv6].  I wish the "works in progress" references had pointers (like [DNSV6]), are they not Internet Drafts?

"At the time of writing, best practice in IPv6 site address planning
 is restricted due to limited wide-scale deployments."

Does this mean "At the time of writing, solid details on best practice in IPv6 address planning is restricted..."?  I  am pretty sure it doesn't mean that the applicability of best practice is limited...

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Abstain

Abstain (2006-06-21 for -)
No email
send info
I think this document fails to meet many of it's goals. I don't think it will help an enterprise figure out how to transition to v6 - there is so many critical things it does not mention, like applications that run on hosts. I have a hard time imagining any easy way to fix it.

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Abstain

Abstain (2006-12-11)
No email
send info
  The response to my DISCUSS position was much lighter than I had
  hoped.  I do not think the point is worth further delay.  I have
  changed my position to ABSTAIN.

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) Abstain

Abstain (2006-06-06 for -)
No email
send info
This document rules so many important things out of scope--nat used
for V4, firewalls, application issues--that it is useless in my mind.
The best I can say is that I don't think it will do any harm.