Generic Aggregate Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Reservations
RFC 4860
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
The choice of draft filename in this case was very confusing. Personally, I would have reviewed this draft a long time ago if the filename had even hinted that it concerned diffserv PHBs.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
1. The Abstract Section includes citations to references to documents using the abbreviations specific to this documents. This is contrary to the recommended practice that an Abstract section should be complete in itself, so it should contain no citations unless they are completely defined within the Abstract. 2. The Intellectual Property section at page 27 includes a 'mailto:' line which seems out of context.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Typographical errors found by Charlie Kaufman during SecDir review: Page 4, fourth from bottom line: "discusses in details" -> "discusses in detail" Page 25, third from bottom line: "andwidth" -> "Bandwidth" Page 27, 8th line: "mailto:" -> ""
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection