Clarification of the Third Party Disclosure Procedure in RFC 3979
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Brian Carpenter) Yes
(Lars Eggert) Yes
(Ted Hardie) Yes
(Russ Housley) Yes
Please pick one spelling: "3rd" or "third" Please include the folloing in the heading on the title page: "Updates: 3979 (once approved)"
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings) No Objection
(David Kessens) No Objection
(Jon Peterson) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu) No Objection
The recommended change is 'changing the word "discloser" to "IPR holder" in the above text' which will make the respective sentence in the text: 'the IETF Executive Director shall request from the IPR holder of such IPR, a written assurance ...' Is the repetition intentional? or should the change rather be just "discloser" to "holder"?
(Mark Townsley) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) Abstain
We do not need yet another diff to the ipr specs. Fold this one in with real revisions.