Skip to main content

Extended ICMP to Support Multi-Part Messages
RFC 4884

Yes

Lars Eggert
(Bill Fenner)
(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Dan Romascanu)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert
(was Discuss) Yes
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes) Yes
Yes ()

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2007-01-22)
Some good points are made in the Gen-ART review at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/reviews/draft-bonica-internet-icmp-14-chisholm.txt
suggesting a tightening of the text in section 5.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2007-01-20)
You say the "impact of this issue is considered to be minimal because many ICMP messages are discarded for". This really worried me. What you are saying here is the "the impact of turning off all ICMP is minimal" - I doubt you really mean that.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()