Symmetric RTP / RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
RFC 4961
Yes
(Cullen Jennings)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Sam Hartman)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert
(was Discuss)
No Objection
Comment
(2007-04-02)
Unknown
> Common Local Transmit and Receive Ports (Symmetric RTP) I have never heard the term "common local port" before reading this document, and I don't think it accurately describes the concept of using the same port pair for both directions of a bidirectional communication.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-03-30)
Unknown
The security considerations say: > > There is no additional security exposure if a host uses symmetric > RTP or symmetric RTCP. > "Additional security exposure" beyond what? Please provide a reference.