Symmetric RTP / RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
RFC 4961
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2015-10-14
|
03 | (System) | Notify list changed from dwing@cisco.com to (None) |
2012-08-22
|
03 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert |
2012-08-22
|
03 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Kessens |
2007-07-31
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
2007-07-31
|
03 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 4961 BCP 131' added by Amy Vezza |
2007-07-31
|
03 | (System) | RFC published |
2007-04-19
|
03 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2007-04-19
|
03 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2007-04-17
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2007-04-17
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2007-04-17
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2007-04-17
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2007-04-17
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza |
2007-04-17
|
03 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert |
2007-04-16
|
03 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2007-04-16
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-wing-behave-symmetric-rtprtcp-03.txt |
2007-04-06
|
03 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-04-05 |
2007-04-05
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2007-04-05
|
03 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
2007-04-05
|
03 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
2007-04-04
|
03 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley |
2007-04-04
|
03 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2007-04-02
|
03 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
2007-04-02
|
03 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Jari Arkko |
2007-04-02
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-04-02
|
03 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot comment] > Common Local Transmit and Receive Ports (Symmetric RTP) I have never heard the term "common local port" before … [Ballot comment] > Common Local Transmit and Receive Ports (Symmetric RTP) I have never heard the term "common local port" before reading this document, and I don't think it accurately describes the concept of using the same port pair for both directions of a bidirectional communication. |
2007-04-02
|
03 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot discuss] Section 5., paragraph 1: > There is no additional security exposure if a host uses symmetric RTP > or symmetric RTCP. … [Ballot discuss] Section 5., paragraph 1: > There is no additional security exposure if a host uses symmetric RTP > or symmetric RTCP. DISCUSS: I don't think this is true. If both directions of a communication use the same port pair, it becomes easier for an attacker to locate the reverse flow for a given flow instance. Especially when the host would otherwise use randomized ports. |
2007-04-02
|
03 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2007-03-30
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] The security considerations say: > > There is no additional security exposure if a host uses symmetric > RTP or … [Ballot comment] The security considerations say: > > There is no additional security exposure if a host uses symmetric > RTP or symmetric RTCP. > "Additional security exposure" beyond what? Please provide a reference. |
2007-03-30
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Derek Atkins. |
2007-03-30
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Derek Atkins |
2007-03-30
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Derek Atkins |
2007-03-29
|
03 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2007-03-18
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | [Note]: 'Picked up from RFC-editor independent submission to be a AD-sponsored BCP. Was earlier through an RFC 3932 review, so please re-review.' added by Magnus … [Note]: 'Picked up from RFC-editor independent submission to be a AD-sponsored BCP. Was earlier through an RFC 3932 review, so please re-review.' added by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-03-07
|
03 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Last Call Comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2007-03-07
|
03 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Last Call Comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2007-03-01
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2007-03-01
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2007-03-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-04-05 by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-03-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-03-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Last Call was requested by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-28
|
03 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2007-02-28
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-wing-behave-symmetric-rtprtcp-02.txt |
2007-02-26
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from In Last Call by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-26
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Change classification and will redo the IETF last call as soon as an update based on comments has been done. |
2007-02-26
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Intended Status has been changed to BCP from Informational |
2007-02-21
|
03 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Last Call Comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2007-02-12
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2007-02-12
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Last Call was requested by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-12
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-08
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | State Changes to AD Evaluation from IESG Evaluation by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-08
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Taking on this document as AD-sponsored. |
2007-02-08
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Note field has been cleared by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-08
|
03 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Kessens |
2007-02-08
|
03 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Sam Hartman |
2007-02-08
|
03 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2007-02-08
|
03 | David Kessens | [Ballot discuss] Considering the write-up: Note to RFC Editor The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in the WGs … [Ballot discuss] Considering the write-up: Note to RFC Editor The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in the WGs AVT and BEHAVE, but this does not prevent publishing. And two ADs balloting a 'YES', would it not be better to make this an AD sponsored individual submission (or is it AD sponsored independent submission ;-)) as there apparently is plenty of IETF support for this document ? |
2007-02-08
|
03 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Kessens |
2007-02-08
|
03 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2007-02-07
|
03 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sam Hartman |
2007-02-07
|
03 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2007-02-06
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2007-02-06
|
03 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Evaluation Comment: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2007-02-04
|
03 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2007-02-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-02-08 by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | [Note]: 'Note this is an RFC 3932 review' added by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Ballot has been issued by Magnus Westerlund |
2007-02-01
|
03 | Magnus Westerlund | Created "Approve" ballot |
2007-02-01
|
03 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2007-02-01
|
03 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2007-02-01
|
03 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2007-01-25
|
03 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested |
2005-06-06
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-wing-behave-symmetric-rtprtcp-01.txt |
2005-05-24
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-wing-behave-symmetric-rtprtcp-00.txt |