Skip to main content

Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status
RFC 4966

Yes

(Brian Carpenter)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ross Callon)

No Objection

(Dan Romascanu)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert Yes

Comment (2007-03-07)
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 1:
> Updates: 2766 (if approved)

  s/Updates/Obsoletes/ (easily done with an RFC Editor Note)

(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(David Kessens; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-03-08)
Section 8.

It appears that
   alternatives to NAT-PT exist to cover the circumstances where NAT-PT
   has been suggested as a solution, such as the use of tunneling and
   header compression in 3GPP scenarios.

Can someone please provide a referenence in this section to where Header compression is a solution for IPv4/IPv6 translation. It appears very strange to me. I can understand if it is used to reduce the impact of the tunneling in regards to MTU and bit-rate issues. But mentioning header compression in the conclusion out of the blue seems strange. Maybe removing the mentioning of header compression is an alternative to providing a reference.

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-03-07)
  s/IPSEC/IPsec/

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()