Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional Router Capabilities
RFC 4970
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) Yes
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
It would be useful to expand LSA at the first occurence in the Abstract section.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
The security consideration section seems thin. Isn't it recommended that one actually describe which parts of an referenced document that is applicable to this doc.
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with Mark. I'd be OK with designated expert with clear guidelines (probably assisted by a mailing list) although ietf consensus might be easier.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection