Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Advertising Router Information
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Bill Fenner) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter) No Objection
Comment (2007-02-02 for -)
Header line: Proposed status: Standard should be Intended status: Standards Track Editorial points from Gen-Art review by Francis Dupont: - 1 page 2: I know what is IS-IS but a random reader likely doesn't: add a reference to the ISO IS (i.e., [IS-IS]) in the first sentence. (and perhaps add IS-IS-IP too, cf last comment). - 1 page 2: "two" examples numbered from 1 to 3 (:-)! - 2 page 3: I don't understand the "to prevent TLV looping" but perhaps it is not "TLV" looping? - 3 page 3: I don't like the term "domain flooding scope", it seems a bit redundant to me. - 3 page 4: "stale capabilities information A system" ^^ ", a "? - 9.1 page 6: is ISIS-TE really a normative reference? BTW there is no reference in the text (same for the previous item, there is a nice checker for this: I suggest to use it...)
(Lars Eggert) (was Discuss) No Objection
Section 1., paragraph 5: > The use of IS-IS for Path Computation Element (PCE) discovery may > also be considered and will be discussed in the PCE WG. RFCs shouldn't typically discuss what WGs at the time did or didn't do. Remove paragraph.