OSPF-xTE: Experimental Extension to OSPF for Traffic Engineering
RFC 4973

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <iana@iana.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Experimental RFC to be: 
         draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-08.txt 

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'OSPF-xTE: An 
experimental extension to OSPF for Traffic Engineering' 
<draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-08.txt> as an Experimental RFC. 

The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in 
the datatracker 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=7167&rfc_flag=0) 
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit 
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot 
and the comment log. 

The IESG contact person is Bill Fenner.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-08.txt


The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Technical Summary
 
   This document defines OSPF-xTE, an experimental traffic engineering
   (TE) extension to the link-state routing protocol OSPF. OSPF-xTE
   defines new TE LSAs to disseminate TE metrics within an autonomous
   System (AS), which may consist of multiple areas. Further, when
   an AS consists of TE and non-TE nodes, OSPF-xTE ensures that
   non-TE nodes in the AS do not see the TE LSAs by using an alternate
   OSPF flooding algorithm. OSPF-xTE generates a stand-alone TE
   Link State Database (TE-LSDB), distinct from the native OSPF
   LSDB, for computation of TE circuit paths.
 
Working Group Summary
 
 The draft was discussed in OSPF and CCAMP WGs as an alternative to
 the technology described in RFC 3630. The decision was that the available
 solutions were adequate and there was no compelling reason to change
 the direction.
 
Protocol Quality
 
 The document was reviewed by OSPF and CCAMP WGs as part of the discussion
 mentioned above.

RFC Editor Note

Please add the following IESG Note:

      The content of this RFC was at one time considered by the IETF,
      and therefore it may resemble a current IETF work in progress or a
      published IETF work.  This RFC is not a candidate for any level of
      Internet Standard.  The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the
      fitness of this RFC for any purpose and in particular notes that  
      the decision to publish is not based on IETF review for such
      things as security, congestion control, or inappropriate
      interaction with deployed protocols.  The RFC Editor has chosen to
      publish this document at its discretion.  Readers of this RFC
      should exercise caution in evaluating its value for implementation
      and deployment.  See RFC 3932 for more information.

      See RFC 3630 for the IETF consensus protocol for OSPF Traffic
      Engineering.  The OSPF WG position at the time of publication
      is that although this proposal has some useful properties,
      the protocol in RFC 3630 is sufficient for the traffic
      engineering needs that have been identified so far, and the
      cost of migrating to this proposal exceeds its benefits.