A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services
RFC 5031

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Jon Peterson) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-06-20)
No email
send info
  Agree with Russ on the title. Similarly, the abstract also doesn't
  talk about ECRIT.

Section 3., paragraph 2:
>    Declared registrant of the namespace:
>       Registering organization:  IETF ECRIT Working Group

  Can an ephemeral entity like a WG be a registrant? Should this be "the
  IETF" instead? (Question for the APP ADs.)

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

Comment (2007-06-21 for -)
No email
send info
I support the "fix this" DISCUSS comments from Lars and Russ.

Has there been a urn-nid@apps.ietf.org review of this as recommended by RFC 3406?

The registration should be owned by the IETF, to avoid the later need for
an IESG action to change ownership in the event the ECRIT WG completes.

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection