Skip to main content

Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms
RFC 5033

Yes

Lars Eggert
(Jari Arkko)
(Magnus Westerlund)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert Yes

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-22)
When reading this, it wondered if the 2914 reference should be normative. I don't care one way or the other but might be worth 10 seconds of thought.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-17)
I am not sure why section 5 (Conclusions) is needed, it looks like a leftover from previous versions of the document. Also why is it using the term 'researchers' instead of 'authors of congestion control schemes' for example?

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Record, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2007-06-06)
I believe the document is a bit weak in its choice of words in some areas for a BCP (e.g., rather than "we would hope the guidelines in this document inform" simply state "the guidelines in this document inform").

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-22)
  The Gen-ART Review by Gonzalo Camarillo uncovered the following
  IDNits tool complaints:

  ** There are 2 instances of too long lines in the document, the
     longest one being 1 character in excess of 72.

  ** There are 70 instances of lines with control characters in the
     document.

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-22)
If this is not a binding guideline, I don't understand why we are publishing as a BCP rather than informational.

However the text is good so I'm not going to hold a discuss.

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()