Email Submission Operations: Access and Accountability Requirements
RFC 5068

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Lars Eggert) Yes

Comment (2007-07-13)
No email
send info
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 15:
>    The document seeks BCP status.  Comments and discussion of this
>    document should be addressed to the mailing list.

  Remove this paragraph.

(Chris Newman) Yes

(Dan Romascanu) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

Comment (2007-08-21)
No email
send info
I'm quite surprised to be able to support publication of this document
and especially support doing so as a BCP.  I expected to have a
discuss based on some of my and others' comments in the first and
second last call.  However that ended up not being the case.  While I
agree with the general principle that John Klensin raised, I think
that in this case BCP is an appropriate status.

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection