Email Submission Operations: Access and Accountability Requirements
RFC 5068
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert Yes
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 15: > The document seeks BCP status. Comments and discussion of this > document should be addressed to the ietf-smtp@imc.org mailing list. Remove this paragraph.
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) Yes
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) Yes
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
I'm quite surprised to be able to support publication of this document and especially support doing so as a BCP. I expected to have a discuss based on some of my and others' comments in the first and second last call. However that ended up not being the case. While I agree with the general principle that John Klensin raised, I think that in this case BCP is an appropriate status.
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection