Email Submission Operations: Access and Accountability Requirements
RFC 5068
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Lars Eggert) Yes
Comment (2007-07-13)
No email
send info
send info
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 15: > The document seeks BCP status. Comments and discussion of this > document should be addressed to the ietf-smtp@imc.org mailing list. Remove this paragraph.
(Chris Newman) Yes
(Dan Romascanu) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) No Objection
Comment (2007-08-21)
No email
send info
send info
I'm quite surprised to be able to support publication of this document and especially support doing so as a BCP. I expected to have a discuss based on some of my and others' comments in the first and second last call. However that ended up not being the case. While I agree with the general principle that John Klensin raised, I think that in this case BCP is an appropriate status.