OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
RFC 5088
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
I would like to salute the authors of the document and the PCE WG for the Manageability Considerations section. This section could be used as a reference for the type of information that should be included in a protocol document.
(David Ward; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
From the Gen-ART review by Robert Sparks... The introduction claims that this draft does not define any new OSPF elements of procedure, but section 5 is titled "Elements of Procedure" and does appear to contain some significant behavioral requirements. Should the introduction be modified?
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection