Skip to main content

OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
RFC 5088

Yes

(Ross Callon)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Sam Hartman)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-06-19)
I would like to salute the authors of the document and the PCE WG for the Manageability Considerations section. This section could be used as a reference for the type of information that should be included in a protocol document.

(David Ward; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2007-06-19)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-06-20)
  From the Gen-ART review by Robert Sparks...

  The introduction claims that this draft does not define any new  
  OSPF elements of procedure, but section 5 is titled "Elements of  
  Procedure" and does appear to contain some significant behavioral  
  requirements. Should the introduction be modified?

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()