Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6
RFC 5095

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Ross Callon) Yes

(Lars Eggert) Yes

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

(Chris Newman) Yes

(Tim Polk) Yes

(David Ward) Yes

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2007-10-02)
No email
send info
  From Gen-ART Review by Elwyn Davies.

  Section 3: "IPv6 nodes **MUST NOT process** RH0 in packets whose
  destination address in the IPv6 header is an address assigned to them.
  Such packets...":  The rest of the section then goes on to describe
  just how the node processes the header!  I think it should say
  something like: "An IPv6 node that receives a packet with a 
  destination address assigned to it and containing an RH0 extension
  header MUST NOT execute the algorithm specified in the latter part
  of Section 4.4 of [RFC2460] for RH0. Instead such packets..."

  Section 4.2, 1st paragraph: The abbreviation RH is not defined
  (only RH0) so s/type-2 RH/type 2 Routing Header/

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection