Skip to main content

MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol
RFC 5097

Yes

(Magnus Westerlund)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2007-10-17)
1. New text:
"for UDP-Lite should resemble the that of UDP [RFC4113], with"
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^ Need to fix grammar.

2. In the original MIB Doctor review: 

> 13) Typo in DESCRIPTION of udpliteEndpointTable:
>     "In all cases where the remote is a wildcard, the"
>
>     Insert "address" after "remote".

NOW: "In all cases where the remote is a wildcard address,"

"remote" is not a noun, so I still consider this grammatically wrong...
"address" was inserted in the wrong place in the sentence.  Should be "In all cases where the remote address is a wildcard,"

3. It is preferable to avoid mentioning RFC numbers in the Abstract section, as these may change while this specification says. 

4. Also in the Abstract s/MIB entities/MIB objects/

5. in Section 1.1 - s/Another contrast to UDP/Another difference from the UDP MIB module/

6. DESCRIPTION clauses of udpliteEndPointLocalAddress and udpliteEndPointLocalAddress include the phrase 'else the information cannot be accessed using SNMPv1, SNMPv2c, or SNMPv3.' This is problematic because they mention older SNMP versions which are not standard, and because the limitation that is being alluded is not only of SNMP but also of the SMI. I suggest to drep this text or to replace it by 'this is because of SNMP and SMI limitations'. 

7. DESCRIPTION clause of udpliteEndpointMinCoverage s/If set to 0,/A value of 0 indicates that/

8. Section 4, paragraph 3 - s/ay/may/

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-10-16)
Editorial nits in Section 4, paragraph 3:

s/module ay be used/module may be used/
s/imply information/infer information/