State of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Communication across Network Address Translators (NATs)
RFC 5128

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

INTRODUCTION, paragraph 11:
> Table of Contents

  Has no page numbers?

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

Please fix the grammar in the "Document Quality" section of the IESG
write-up.

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

NITS: 

Might want to define SOHO

TODO - check meaning lie 

I don't think it is correct to say Skype uses central public server for registration (at least the type of registration you mean here)

In section 5.2 , mention audio conferencing. I think this is a bad example in that it often was media relay. Did you mean to just say RTP audio sessions?

Other than I am author, any particular reason not to reference draft-jennings-behave-test-results? If there is a problem with that work, it would be nice to know about it. I note that instead you are using a link that says at the top of the page "This page, the NAT servers, and the results database are no longer being actively maintained. "

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

RFC3489 is used as an Informative Reference for [STUN]. Would not it be better to use http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-11.txt instead?

(David Ward; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) (was No Record, No Objection) No Objection

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection