Label Switched Path Stitching with Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (GMPLS TE)
RFC 5150

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Ross Callon) Yes

(David Ward) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2007-08-16)
No email
send info
  From the Gen-ART Review by Francis Dupont

  Comments: there are only some editorial comments, i.e., things which
  should be handled by the RFC editor:
  - abstract page 2: from from -> from
  - TOC page 3: for LSP_ATTRIBUTES Object -> for the ...?
  - 2 page 5: are required -> are required to
  - 5.1 page 8: LSP ([RFC3473]), to -> LSP ([RFC3473]) to
  - 5.1.1 page 8: some other e2e LSP. -> some other e2e LSPs.?
  - 5.1.1 page 8: in the Resv, -> in the Resv message,
  - page 9: in the Resv Label. -> in the Resv message.?
  - 5.1.2 page 10: bandwidth, local TE -> bandwidth or local TE
  - 5.1.2 page 11: a Path Msg -> a Path message
  - 5.1.2 page 11: a PathErr with the error codes ->
    a PathErr message with the error code?
  - 5.1.3 page 11: I can't parse this sentence (commas?):
    An e2e LSP traversing an S-LSP, SHOULD record in the RRO for that
    hop, an identifier corresponding to the S-LSP TE link.
  - 5.2.3 page 14: PCE -> Path Computation Element
  - 10 page 18: please add ", USA" after ZIP codes.

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) (was Discuss) No Record