RTP Payload Format for the Enhanced Variable Rate Wideband Codec (EVRC-WB) and the Media Subtype Updates for EVRC-B Codec
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
(Cullen Jennings) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
(Sam Hartman) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Chris Newman) (was Discuss) No Objection
When diffing the media type registrations for audio/EVRCWB and audio/EVRCWB1 I noticed differences due to editorial corrections that were made to one and not the other. Please make all the registrations consistent (e.g., fix typo "in in" and use a proper reference for 3GPP2 C.S0014-C). I question the wisdom of introducing a new storage format here when there is already audio/3gpp2 and video/3gpp2 storage formats. I presume those are container formats (similar to tiff). What is the technical justification for the creation of an incompatible storage format for a subset of the data? Would it perhaps be better to profile audio/3gpp2 to an interoperable subset as we did for tiff fax mode (RFC 3950)?
(Jon Peterson) No Objection
(Tim Polk) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu) No Objection
Comment (2007-10-31 for -)
EVRC should be expanded in the title or in the Abstract session.
(David Ward) No Objection
Magnus Westerlund (was Discuss) No Objection
section 9.1.1: maxinterleave: Maximum number for interleaving length (field LLL in the Interleaving Octet). The interleaving lengths used in the entire session MUST NOT exceed this maximum value. If not signaled, the maxinterleave length MUST be 5. I think it would be good if this parameter expressed its valid range. For example: maxinterleave: Maximum number for interleaving length (field LLL in the Interleaving Octet) [0..7]. The interleaving lengths used in the entire session MUST NOT exceed this maximum value. If not signaled, the maxinterleave length MUST be 5.