BGP-Based Auto-Discovery for Layer-1 VPNs
RFC 5195
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Sandy's SecDir review also identified a number of places that would benefit from some clarification of the text, and provided editorial comments that should be taken into acccount.
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
Sandy Murphy has asked what happens if the basic security assumption does not hold. Given the importance of the basic trust assumption - all the participants are trustworthy, and trust is transitive - it would also be nice if the security considerations noted *why* the wg feels this is a reasonable assumption. (I assume it is based on the fact that all the peers are members of the same provider network?)