BGP-Based Auto-Discovery for Layer-1 VPNs
RFC 5195

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(David Ward) Yes

(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2008-05-05)
No email
send info
Sandy's SecDir review also identified a number of places that would
benefit from some clarification of the text, and provided editorial
comments that should be taken into acccount.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2008-05-08 for -)
No email
send info
Sandy Murphy has asked what happens if the basic security assumption
does not hold.

Given the importance of the basic trust assumption - all the participants
are trustworthy, and trust is transitive - it would also be nice if the
security considerations noted *why* the wg feels this is a reasonable
assumption.  (I assume it is based on the fact that all the peers are
members of the same provider network?)

Magnus Westerlund No Objection