Skip to main content

BGP-Based Auto-Discovery for Layer-1 VPNs
RFC 5195

Yes

(David Ward)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(David Ward; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2008-05-05)
Sandy's SecDir review also identified a number of places that would
benefit from some clarification of the text, and provided editorial
comments that should be taken into acccount.

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2008-05-08)
Sandy Murphy has asked what happens if the basic security assumption
does not hold.

Given the importance of the basic trust assumption - all the participants
are trustworthy, and trust is transitive - it would also be nice if the
security considerations noted *why* the wg feels this is a reasonable
assumption.  (I assume it is based on the fact that all the peers are
members of the same provider network?)