Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension
RFC 5203
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2017-05-16
|
02 | (System) | Changed document authors from "Julien Laganier" to "Julien Laganier, Teemu Koponen, Lars Eggert" |
|
2015-10-14
|
02 | (System) | Notify list changed from hip-chairs@ietf.org to (None) |
|
2012-08-22
|
02 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Sam Hartman |
|
2008-04-21
|
02 | (System) | This was part of a ballot set with: draft-ietf-hip-base, draft-ietf-hip-esp, draft-ietf-hip-mm, draft-ietf-hip-rvs |
|
2008-04-21
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'RFC 5201<br>RFC 5202<br>RFC 5203<br>RFC 5204<br>RFC 5206' added by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-04-21
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-04-21
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'RFC 5201' added by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-04-18
|
02 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2007-12-11
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
|
2007-12-11
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
|
2007-12-11
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
|
2007-12-10
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
|
2007-12-10
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
|
2007-12-07
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
|
2007-12-05
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2007-12-05
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2007-12-05
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2007-12-05
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2007-12-05
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza |
|
2007-12-05
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
|
2007-12-03
|
02 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Sam Hartman |
|
2007-12-03
|
02 | Mark Townsley | [Note]: 'After Sam''s discuss is cleared, I need one more position recorded from Dan, Jon or Cullen to have the 2/3 necessary to approve these … [Note]: 'After Sam''s discuss is cleared, I need one more position recorded from Dan, Jon or Cullen to have the 2/3 necessary to approve these specs.' added by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-12-03
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Note field has been cleared by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-09-26
|
02 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-09-26
|
02 | Mark Townsley | [Note]: 'Awaiting -09, and then Mark to writeup IESG note' added by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-04-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza |
|
2007-04-19
|
02 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
|
2007-04-19
|
02 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
|
2007-04-19
|
02 | David Ward | [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Ward has been changed to Recuse from No Objection by David Ward |
|
2007-04-19
|
02 | David Ward | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward |
|
2007-04-19
|
02 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
|
2007-04-18
|
02 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman |
|
2007-04-18
|
02 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
|
2007-04-18
|
02 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
|
2007-04-18
|
02 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk |
|
2007-04-17
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2007-04-16
|
02 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from No Objection by Tim Polk |
|
2007-04-06
|
02 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-04-05 |
|
2007-04-02
|
02 | Sam Hartman | State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Sam Hartman |
|
2007-04-02
|
02 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
|
2007-03-26
|
02 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
|
2007-03-23
|
02 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
|
2007-03-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-03-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-04-05 by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-02-05
|
02 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Last Call Comments: Action #1 Upon approval of this document, the IANA will create the following registry "HIP Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/TBD Initial contents … IANA Last Call Comments: Action #1 Upon approval of this document, the IANA will create the following registry "HIP Parameters" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/TBD Initial contents of this registry will be: sub-registry "HIP Parameter types" created by [RFC-hip-registration-02] Adding a new type requires new IETF specifications. value Type Reference ------------ ------------------------ TDB1 REG_INFO [RFC-hip-registration-02] TDB2 REG_REQUEST [RFC-hip-registration-02] TDB3 REG_RESPONSE [RFC-hip-registration-02] 0-200 Reserved by IANA 201-255 Reserved by IANA for private use 256-65635 Closed by IANA standards action to open sub-registry "HIP Failure Types" created by [RFC-hip-registration-02] Adding a new type requires new IETF specifications. Failure Type Reason Reference ------------ -------------------------------------------- --------- 0 Registration requires additional credentials [RFC-hip- registration-02] 1 Registration type unavailable [RFC-hip- registration-02] 2-200 Reserved by IANA [RFC-hip- registration-02] 201-255 Reserved by IANA for private use [RFC-hip- registration-02] 256-65635 Closed by IANA standards action to open We understand the above to be the only IANA Action for this document. |
|
2007-01-30
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Merged with draft-ietf-hip-base by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-01-30
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Merged with draft-ietf-pana-pana by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-01-29
|
02 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2007-01-18
|
02 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman |
|
2007-01-18
|
02 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Last Call was requested by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2007-01-15
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2006-10-30
|
02 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-10-19
|
02 | Mark Townsley | Shepherding AD has been changed to Mark Townsley from Dan Romascanu |
|
2006-09-26
|
02 | Dinara Suleymanova | PROTO Write-up (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in particular, … PROTO Write-up (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in particular, does he or she believe this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication? The Document Shepherd for this document is Gonzalo Camarillo, who has personally reviewed this document and believes it is ready to be forwarded to the IESG for publication. (1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members and from key non-WG members? Does the Document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? Yes, it has been thoroughly reviewed both inside and outside the WG. (1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular or broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with AAA, internationalization or XML? No. (1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if those issues have been discussed in the WG and the WG has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. No. (1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? The whole WG is behind this document. (1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire will be entered into the ID Tracker.) No. (1.g) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document satisfies all ID nits? (See http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html and http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Yes. (1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and informative? Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the strategy for their completion? Are there normative references that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967]. Yes, this document has normative and informative references. The HIP WG has already requested the publication of all its normative dependencies. (1.i) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract and/or introduction of the document. If not, this may be an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract or introduction. This document specifies a registration mechanism for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) that allows hosts to register with services, such as HIP rendezvous servers or middleboxes. Working Group Summary Was there anything in WG process that is worth noting? For example, was there controversy about particular points or were there decisions where the consensus was particularly rough? No. Document Quality Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that merit special mention as having done a thorough review, e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? Yes, a number of vendors are already implementing this draft. |
|
2006-09-26
|
02 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested |
|
2006-06-07
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-hip-registration-02.txt |
|
2005-12-16
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-hip-registration-01.txt |
|
2005-09-21
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-hip-registration-00.txt |