Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Extension
RFC 5231
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2018-12-20
|
04 | (System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes the RELATIONAL extension to the Sieve mail filtering language defined in RFC 3028 … Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes the RELATIONAL extension to the Sieve mail filtering language defined in RFC 3028. This extension extends existing conditional tests in Sieve to allow relational operators. In addition to testing their content, it also allows for testing of the number of entities in header and envelope fields. This document obsoletes RFC 3431. [STANDARDS-TRACK]') |
|
2015-10-14
|
04 | (System) | Notify list changed from cyrus@daboo.name, alexey.melnikov@isode.com to alexey.melnikov@isode.com |
|
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley |
|
2008-01-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-01-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 5231' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-01-16
|
04 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2006-09-26
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor |
|
2006-02-23
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-02-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2006-02-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2006-02-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2006-02-17
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] This was approved so I'm sending this comment as a suggestion to Scott and Alexey as something they could advise the RFC Editor … [Ballot comment] This was approved so I'm sending this comment as a suggestion to Scott and Alexey as something they could advise the RFC Editor for doing while the document is on the queue: It would be best not to send drafts to the RFC Editor blocked for long times by normative references. This has a number of references to 3028bis, which appears to have a long time before it will be ready for publication. Those references seem to be generic enough to switch them to RFC 3028, with a parenthesis "(at the time of this publication a revision of RFC 3028 is in preparation)" which would free the document. Note about 3028bis: it's currently blocking 2 other docs in the RFC Ed queue, which maybe could have the same strategy applied. Bill has some data on the drafts blocking other drafts at http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/iesg/rfcq-random-checks.html The other incomplete normative is draft-newman-i18n-comparator, but I see it has now gone to Last Call, and though it's got a lot of work ahead, with a complex IANA registry etc, it seems close enough. |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
|
2006-02-16
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] It would be best not to send drafts to the RFC Editor blocked for long times by normative references. This has a number … [Ballot comment] It would be best not to send drafts to the RFC Editor blocked for long times by normative references. This has a number of references to 3028bis, which appears to have a long time before it will be ready for publication. Those references seem to be generic enough to switch them to RFC 3028, with a parenthesis "(at the time of this publication a revision of RFC 3028 is in preparation)" which would free the document. Note about 3028bis: it's currently blocking 2 other docs in the RFC Ed queue, which maybe could have the same strategy applied. Bill has some data on the drafts blocking other drafts at http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/iesg/rfcq-random-checks.html The other incomplete normative is draft-newman-i18n-comparator, but I see it has now gone to Last Call, and though it's got a lot of work ahead, with a complex IANA registry etc, it seems close enough. |
|
2006-02-15
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin |
|
2006-02-15
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
|
2006-02-15
|
04 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
|
2006-02-15
|
04 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
|
2006-02-14
|
04 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
|
2006-02-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley |
|
2006-02-14
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
|
2006-02-12
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] In addition to obsoleting RFC 3431, does this document also update RFC 3028? |
|
2006-02-12
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
|
2006-02-08
|
04 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will update the reference to be this document for the "relational" sieve extension found at the … IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will update the reference to be this document for the "relational" sieve extension found at the following: http://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-extensions |
|
2006-02-06
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-02-06
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Ballot has been issued by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-02-06
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2006-02-06
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Telechat date was changed to 2006-02-16 from 2006-03-02 by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-27
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-27
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-03-02 by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-27
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Note]: 'Document shepherd is Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>' added by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-26
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Last Call was requested by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Per discussion with working group chairs, changing intended status to Proposed Standard. |
|
2006-01-12
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Draft Standard |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to AD is watching from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Per Barry Leiba, an implementation report is not yet available. The document includes references to two I-Ds and one Proposed Standard (2822). Draft standards can't … Per Barry Leiba, an implementation report is not yet available. The document includes references to two I-Ds and one Proposed Standard (2822). Draft standards can't include normative references to documents at a lower level on the standards track without having to invoke variance procedures. I can't invoke those procedures for I-Ds. Given the lack of an implementation report and the normative reference issues I have to push this one back to you guys. The document might be done, but I can't ask the IESG to evaluate the document for Draft Standard status without having these other procedural issues resolved. |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | idnits output: idnits 1.84 tmp/draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt: Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate... * The … idnits output: idnits 1.84 tmp/draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt: Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html: Checking conformance with RFC 3978/3979 boilerplate... * The document seems to lack an RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line -- however, there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate error? RFC 3978 Section 5.4 paragraph 1 text: "Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006)." ... text found in draft: "Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject ............................................^ to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.") * The document seems to lack an RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Reference to BCP 78. RFC 3978 Section 5.4 paragraph 2 text: "This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights." Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: Nothing found here (but these checks do not cover all of 1id-guidelines.txt yet). Miscellaneous warnings: None. These look like idnits errors; I'll check. The proto write-up said that idnits passed without error -- why? |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Scott Hollenbeck |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Intended Status has been changed to Draft Standard from None |
|
2006-01-03
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state AD is watching |
|
2005-12-28
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt |
|
2005-12-02
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-03.txt |
|
2005-11-21
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-02.txt |
|
2005-03-17
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-01.txt |
|
2005-02-15
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-00.txt |