A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Chris Newman) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
A lot of draft-hansens, draft-klensins, draft-melnikovs, etc. Documents that are discussed on specific mailing lists around a topic. I counted over 60% individual submission rate over WG submission rate on the APPS area. Good documents. Necessary documents. Stuff that should be done. But are you sure you don't need more WGs? I do a lot of individual submissions too, but I also find that WG documents do get more review, more exposure from the IETF community, easier to delegate work to chairs, etc. Is there something that blocks us from having more WGs to look at these things, e.g., around e-mail? Are the updates too spread out to define a useful WG for them? Or does our process of starting up a WG have a too high bar?