Extensible Authentication Protocol Tunneled Transport Layer Security Authenticated Protocol Version 0 (EAP-TTLSv0)
RFC 5281
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(David Ward)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert
No Record
Comment
(2008-04-19)
Unknown
Any reason why this is going for Informational rather than PS?
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-04-24)
Unknown
Section 9.2 indicates that AVPs may be sent in the clear in the initial Start packet from the server. Possible uses are indicated in the text. However, it is unclear which AVPs are allowed to appear here. Joel Halpern suggested in his Gen-ART review an additional sentence at the end of the first paragraph of section 11.3: "Multiple authentication is only supported by this protocol in conjunction with EAP."
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown