A General Mechanism for RTP Header Extensions
RFC 5285

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

Magnus Westerlund Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2008-06-18)
No email
send info

1. Should not this document be marked as updating RFC3550 (if approved)? 

2. Section 10 should be taken out from the final version of the document at publication. Actually the notes to the RFC Editor could have been inserted in the respective sections of the document.

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection