IS-IS Extensions for Traffic Engineering
RFC 5305
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
I do not intent to block the publication of this document or of the whole set of is-is documents as PS, but I would like to raise the issue of the manageability and operational considerations. > Mechanisms and procedures to migrate to the new TLVs are not discussed in this document. Where are they discussed? What is the operational impact of the migration on existing networks? Also, what changes from a manageability point of view. Does the IS-IS MIB published as RFC4444 already cover the functionality described in the series of I-Ds that we are now migrating from Experimental to PS, or does it need an update? Or maybe some other new management interfaces need to be introduced?
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
I support the publication of this spec as PS. I reviewed the diffs to RFC 3784 and they seemed correct. I did have a few questions and observations though: 1. I didn't understand the difference in use for Interface IP address and Neighbor IP address options. Is some additional guidance needed here? But this is the first IS-IS document that I read, its possible that the answer is in some other documents :-) 2. For my education, what is the state of IPv6 support in IS-IS? 3. In the document header, there is confusing linewrap on "Working Group". 4. The first author's contact information needs an update. I changed the tracker to include him explicitly.
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) Recuse
ISIS has an IPv6 draft for the base proto and a V6-TE draft. V6 in ISIS is widely developed and deployed on the internet