IS-IS Generic Cryptographic Authentication
RFC 5310
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
Figure 1:
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type 10 | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Key ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| Authentication Data (Variable)|
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
I found the formatting confusing. Does the missing
fourth octet mean that it is (a) reserved or (b)
omitted and Auth Type and Key ID are actually consequtive
fields? Please clarify.
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) (was Yes) Recuse