Joint Working Team (JWT) Report on MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile
RFC 5317

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Ross Callon) (was Discuss) Yes

(Russ Housley) Yes

Comment (2008-10-07)
No email
send info
  Section 1 says: "... a set of power point slides ..."; I suggest
  that "power point" be dropped.  These slides are available only in
  PDF, so their original format is not important.

  Section 2: s/fulfil/fulfill/

  Section 2: The final sentence of the section contains a missing
  reference.  Please provide it.

  Section 5: s/case by case basis/case-by-case basis/

  Section 7: The first sentence is missing a period.

(Chris Newman) Yes

(Tim Polk) Yes

Comment (2008-10-08)
No email
send info
[Before my comments, I'd like to say thanks to everyone in the IETF (and ITU-T) that worked
on this problem for all the hard work you did.  You guys really took one for the team, and I
personally appreciate it!]

A couple of nits:

Abstract

s/recommended of Option 1/recommended of Option 1/

Section 1 paragraph 4

s/this was supported/supported/

(Mark Townsley) Yes

Comment (2008-10-09)
No email
send info
Old:   "Label for You" (LFU).
New:   "Label For yoU" (LFU).

(David Ward) Yes

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund (was Discuss) No Objection