Payload Format for JPEG 2000 Video: Extensions for Scalability and Main Header Recovery
RFC 5372

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2008-06-17)
No email
send info
  draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10:

  The Abstract would be more clear if it said:
  >
  > This memo describes extended uses for payload header in "RTP Payload
  > Format for JPEG 2000 Video Streams" as specified in RFC XXXX.
  > 
  > -- RFC Editor please replace XXXX with the RFC number assigned to
  > -- draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000

  As David Black pointed out in his Gen-ART Review, the Security
  Considerations paragraph on mh_id concludes with:
  >
  > Care should be taken to prevent implementation bugs with potential
  > security consequences."
  >
  Please provide more specific guidance or drop the sentence.

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection