Deployment Considerations for Lemonade-Compliant Mobile Email
RFC 5383

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
09 (System) Notify list changed from lemonade-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Magnus Westerlund
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2008-10-28
09 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2008-10-28
09 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'BCP 143; RFC 5383' added by Cindy Morgan
2008-10-23
09 (System) RFC published
2007-06-29
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2007-06-29
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-06-27
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-06-27
09 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-06-27
09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-06-27
09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-06-27
09 Chris Newman State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Chris Newman
2007-06-22
09 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2007-06-22
09 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I think the FIREWALLS reference needs to be normative as the advice to what a firewall is normatively required to do in this ...
2007-06-20
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-09.txt
2007-05-25
09 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24
2007-05-24
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2007-05-23
09 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2007-05-23
09 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-05-22
09 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-05-21
09 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
Despite a document editor which produces document revisions in 1-2 business
days when asked, the IESG has introduced over 3 months of delay ...
2007-05-21
09 Chris Newman [Ballot comment]
View changes due to DISCUSS comments from previous IESG review:
  http://tinyurl.com/2w8ufb
2007-05-21
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-08.txt
2007-05-20
09 Chris Newman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24 by Chris Newman
2007-05-20
09 Chris Newman Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24 by Chris Newman
2007-05-17
09 Chris Newman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-05-24 by Chris Newman
2007-05-17
09 Chris Newman State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Chris Newman
2007-05-09
09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-05-09
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-07.txt
2007-05-09
09 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
People seemed to think that the current RFC editor notes deal with all my discuss items but several don't seem to have been ...
2007-05-09
09 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
Section 1 - KEYWORDS defines these for standards track document and is fairly debated what the meaning of them in a BCP is.
2007-04-27
09 Chris Newman State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Chris Newman
2007-04-27
09 Chris Newman Arnt wants to do a new draft because the RFC editor's note would get too long.
2007-04-16
09 Chris Newman Updated writeup with Randy's proposed text to resolve DISCUSS waiting for response from Cullen Jennings
2007-03-29
09 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-03-24
09 Chris Newman Responsible AD has been changed to Chris Newman from Ted Hardie
2007-03-10
09 Cullen Jennings [Note]: 'Eric Burger is PROTO shepherd' added by Cullen Jennings
2007-03-09
09 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
This document is suggesting that the BCP for firewalls is to allow TCP connection to stay open forever.  Many systems today use a ...
2007-03-09
09 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
2007-03-09
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2007-03-09
09 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2007-03-08
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-06.txt
2007-02-28
09 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Magnus Westerlund
2007-02-22
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2007-02-22
09 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by IESG Secretary
2007-02-22
09 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2007-02-22
09 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2007-02-22
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza
2007-02-22
09 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.2, paragraph 2:
>    To this end, client and server systems SHOULD NOT set the TCP
>    keep-alive socket option, ...
2007-02-22
09 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4, paragraph 3:
>    For environments that do not support [TCP] but do support HTTP,

  DISCUSS: First paragraph of section ...
2007-02-22
09 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-02-22
09 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> For environments that do not support [TCP] but do support HTTP,
> email can be offered by deploying webmail.

HTTP uses TCP, ...
2007-02-22
09 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> For environments that do not support [TCP] but do support HTTP,
> email can be offered by deploying webmail.

HTTP uses TCP, ...
2007-02-22
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2007-02-22
09 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter
2007-02-22
09 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens
2007-02-21
09 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-02-20
09 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot comment]
This document tries to help people understand how to deploy firewalls that will work by referencing RFC 2979 which, when filtered to the ...
2007-02-20
09 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I think the TCP Keep Alive advice is too strong. Most mainstream servers OS set a keep alive at two hours. If there ...
2007-02-20
09 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-02-07
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-05.txt
2007-02-05
09 Yoshiko Fong IANA Last Call Comment:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2007-02-05
09 Lars Eggert State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Lars Eggert
2007-02-04
09 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Security considerations, 2nd paragraph, uses the word "insurance."  I
  strongly suspect that this is not talking about an insurance policy. I
  ...
2007-02-04
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2007-02-02
09 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.1:

The client system, the server, as well as all intermediate
    systems MUST NOT terminate these TCP connections simply because ...
2007-02-02
09 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Magnus Westerlund
2007-02-02
09 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-01-30
09 Ted Hardie Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-02-08 by Ted Hardie
2007-01-30
09 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ted Hardie
2007-01-30
09 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie
2007-01-30
09 Ted Hardie Ballot has been issued by Ted Hardie
2007-01-30
09 Ted Hardie Created "Approve" ballot
2007-01-29
09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2007-01-18
09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Marcus Leech
2007-01-18
09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Marcus Leech
2007-01-15
09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-01-15
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-01-14
09 Ted Hardie
DOCUMENT:
Deployment Considerations for lemonade-compliant Mobile Email
draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-04.txt

(1.a) Document Shepherd: Eric Burger, eburger@alum.mit.edu; personally
reviewed this document.  This document is ready for publication.

(1.b) ...
2007-01-14
09 Ted Hardie Last Call was requested by Ted Hardie
2007-01-14
09 Ted Hardie State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ted Hardie
2007-01-14
09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-01-14
09 (System) Last call text was added
2007-01-14
09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-01-14
09 Ted Hardie Intended Status has been changed to BCP from None
2007-01-12
09 Ted Hardie Need clarification of intended status, as WGLC did not specify; note sent to shepherd.
2007-01-12
09 Ted Hardie Draft Added by Ted Hardie in state Publication Requested
2006-11-16
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-04.txt
2006-06-09
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-03.txt
2006-05-12
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-02.txt
2006-05-02
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-01.txt
2006-03-02
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-00.txt