Version 2.0 Microsoft Word Template for Creating Internet Drafts and RFCs
RFC 5385

Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes the properties and use of a revised Microsoft Word template (.dot) for writing Internet Drafts and RFCs. It replaces the initial template described in RFC 3285 to more fully support Word's outline modes and to be easier to use. This template can be direct-printed and direct-viewed, where either is line-for-line identical with RFC Editor-compliant ASCII output. This version obsoletes RFC 3285.

The most recent version of this template and post-processing scripts are available at http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.')

[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 10:
>    This version is
>    intended as an update to RFC3285.

  Then it needs to have an "Updates: 3285" in the header. I also don't
  see a reason why this document shouldn't simply obsolete 3285 - is
  there any functionality lost?

IESG,

This document was submitted to the RFC Editor to be published as an
Informational Independent Submission:
draft-touch-msword-template-v2.0-07.txt

Please let us know if this document conflicts with the IETF standards
process or other work being done in the IETF community.

Four week timeout expires on 7 October 2008.


Version 2.0 Microsoft Word Template
for Creating Internet Drafts and RFCs

This document describes the properties and use of a revised
Microsoft Word template (.dot) for writing Internet Drafts and
RFCs. It updates the initial template described in RFC 3285 to more
fully support Word's outline modes and to be easier to use. This
template can be direct-printed and direct-viewed, where either is
line-for-line identical with RFC Editor-compliant ASCII
output. This version is intended as an update to RFC3285.

The most recent version of this template and post-processing
scripts are available at http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools


This document was reviewed for the RFC Editor ("Independent
Submissions Editor") by Mike Garhns.