Policy-Enabled Path Computation Framework
RFC 5394

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Ross Callon) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2008-04-24 for -)
No email
send info
I am concerned of a number of things with this document. The main issue 
is that it introduces a level of generality that I'm not sure is called
for and brings along with significant complexity. Policy can be applied
and fetched from either clients or servers. Policy can apply to actual 
PC decisions, but also to selection of PCEs. The components necessary 
to implement this architecture are going to be numerous. Does the 
industry really need all this, or was the inclusion of all of these
options part of some compromise?

Also, I was earlier under the impression that COPS is dead, and as a
result it might not be such a good idea to build on it. Maybe that
is not the case?

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) (was Discuss) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection