Unicast UDP Usage Guidelines for Application Designers
RFC 5405
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert Recuse
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
I don't quite understand how the tracker brought this document to the telechat without having Magnus vote "Yes". Presumably Magnus is happy with the document, no?
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
I'd really like to talk a little bit about the MSL - the implementation I see code for a MSL much shorter than the 2 minutes recommended here. The result is that it's very hard to predict how long anything will wait. We would be much better off to revise the MSL to some realistic number - then people might implement that and one would count on it. All you can count on today is that if you have a MSL of 2 minutes, lots of equipment will time out long before that.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
Section 3.4: "This results in a relatively weak protection from in terms of coding theory" I think some noun is missing after the word "from" Same section: "This check is not strong from a coding or cryptographic perspective, and is not designed to detect physical-layer errors or malicious modification of the datagram" Is it that it can't detect or can't distinguish between?
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
There's some repetition of text in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.5, but presumably RFC editor copyediting will take care of that.
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection