Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen Identity-Based Encryption Algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
RFC 5409

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(Sam Hartman) Discuss

Discuss (2007-11-28 for -)
>       The RFC822email is the e-mail address of the recipient in
>       the format defined by [TEXTMSG]. E-mail addresses that
>        contain non-ASCII characters MUST be encoded using punycode
>       [PUNYCODE].

Is this consistent with how we're handling email internationalization
for local parts?

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss, Yes) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) (was Yes) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-12-19)
No email
send info
John Klensin noticed this while reviewing the document and my
discuss text:

The references in this document are a mess.  The two I
spotted immediately are that, while Brandner is a significant
figure around the ITU community, he is not the author of RFC
2119 and Dave Crocker is not the author of 2822, nor does 2822
have the same title as 2821.  I'm on an airplane and can't
check, but I suspect that [DER] is similarly botched, with a
mismatch between author, title, and date (and it is
insufficiently specific for the pointer from the text).

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection