Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Protocol Binding for IEEE 802.11
RFC 5416

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Dan Romascanu) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2008-10-20)
(Updated comment for version -11)

Section 1 says 802.11n is not supported by this specification, but
Section 6.25 defines a field for 802.11n?

Section 8.1: there probably should be IANA considerations text about
how the remaining bits are allocated (or explicitly say that the
remaining bits will not be allocated, and new capabilities require
defining a new WBID).

Section 8.1 should say that there's no bit for WEP because all WTPs
are required to support it (if that's the reason).

Section 10.2 (Message Types): the range to be managed by IANA is not
32 bits, but only 8 (i.e. the unassigned values are 3398915-3399167,
not 0-4294967295).

Section 10.2: message type 3398911 has Enterprise Number 13276, not
13277, so it's not part of the range to be managed by IANA.

Section 10.5 (QoS) says values 0-4 are allocated in this
specification, but Section 6.1 defines only values 0-3.

Section 10.7 (Antenna Combiner) says values 0 and 1 are allocated in
this specification, but Section 6.2 defines values 1-4.

Section 10.8 (Antenna Selection) says values 1-4 are allocated in this
specification, but Section 6.2 defines only values 1-2.

Section 10.9 (Session Key Flags) , "bits two (2) through sixteen"
should be "..through fifteen".

Section 10.10 (Tagging Policy) says bits 5-7 are defined in this spec;
but Section 6.22 defines bits 3-7.

Section 10.12 (WTP Radio Type) says bits 5-7 are defined in this spec,
but Section 6.25 defines bits 4-7.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Comment (2008-10-08 for -)
Again support other DISCUSS positions

(Magnus Westerlund) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection