Skip to main content

Dynamic Provisioning Using Flexible Authentication via Secure Tunneling Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP-FAST)
RFC 5422

Yes

(Tim Polk)

No Objection

(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ron Bonica)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

Comment (2008-08-11)
The document writeup says "This is not the product of any working group.  This is part of the
ongoing effort to document existing deployed EAP methods.  The purpose of this document is to publish existing behavior." That doesn't come out in the document at all. I wonder if this should be explicitly called out in the abstract and/or introduction?

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2008-08-27)
When defining a registry, it's helpful to give a title for the registry
as this is the only way readers of the document can find the IANA registry.

For example, "EAP-FAST PAC Attribute Types" registry, or
"PAC Attribute Type" sub-registry of the "EAP-FAST" registry.

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-08-28)
General area seems odd for this document. Tracker mistake?

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-08-22)
  Vijay Gurbani did a Gen-ART Review of -08 and -09 of this document.
  Please consider the two comments that he raised:

  1/ In S4.1.{2,3}, there is a term "PAC opaque".  I think you
     mean "PAC-Opaque", the opaque data that was defined in S4.1.1.

  2/ In S6.3, first paragraph: should the "should" on line 3 be
     normative?  More so especially since the "MAY" seven lines
     down is normative.